Slouching Toward Gay Takeover of Boy Scouts



One of the more memorable sketches to air on NBC’s “Saturday Night Live” featured actor Alec Baldwin and comedian Adam Sandler as members of a Boy Scout troop.

Baldwin played a gay scoutmaster, “Mr. Armstrong.” Sandler reprised his role as “Canteen Boy,” a scout clearly suffering arrested development.

In the sketch, Mr. Armstrong makes a sexual advance on Canteen Boy, brushing his unshaven face against the lad. So uncomfortable is Sandler’s character, who is not so dimwitted that he doesn’t know a pedophile when he sees one, that he flees into the woods.

The sketch was uproariously funny.

But what is not funny is the prospect that the Boy Scouts of America will today reverse its longstanding policy barring openly gay adults and boys from bringing their homosexuality to scouting.

It is almost certain that if BSA allows gay scoutmasters – like Mr. Armstrong – it is only a matter of time before one of them succumbs to the lust of the lies and the lust of the flesh and molests an innocent young scout.

I’m not hating on homosexuals. I’m not saying they are all child-molesters-in-waiting.

I’m not trying to stir up controversy (as SNL did with its provocative Canteen Boy sketch, which the gay community condemned as homophobic, and for which all-too-politically-correct Alec Baldwin continues to apologize to this day).

I’m just looking at the hard evidence.

Indeed, just this past October, the Boy Scouts of America released 20 years worth of documents revealing a pattern of molestation by not a couple dozen, not a couple hundred, but thousands of grown up men who saw scout troops as a target rich environment to exercise their sexual depravity.

The Los Angeles Times painstakingly examined nearly 1,900 confidential files created between 1970 and 1991 (only God knows how many there have been since then).

The common thread, according to the Times, is that molesters engaged in what psychologists call “grooming behavior,” a gradual seduction in which under-age Boy Scouts were lavished with gifts, favors and attention.

In hundreds of cases, Scout leaders allowed the boys to drive cars, drink alcohol or look at pornography. They gradually tested physical boundaries during skinny dipping, group showers, sleepovers and one-on-one activities.

Those Mau-Mauing the Boy Scouts to open up their ranks to homosexuals would have us believe that doing so will not lead to more unholy man-boy sexual abuse.

But even dimwitted Canteen Boy would know better than that.

This entry was published on February 6, 2013 at 3:36 AM. It’s filed under HOMOSEXUALITY and tagged , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. Follow any comments here with the RSS feed for this post.

6 thoughts on “Slouching Toward Gay Takeover of Boy Scouts

  1. Andrew DeBoer on said:

    You are implying that there are more pedophiles in the gay ranks than in the straight ranks. I would submit that the rate of pedophilia in gays is exactly the same as that in straight men. Homosexuality is not an uncontrollable urge any more than heterosexuality is. I am straight, and am very attracted to women, but not to girls, and abhor the straight men who prey upon girls. I am also married, and although I very much appreciate the beauty and wonder of women, I keep my expressions of those feelings for my wife. A gay man takes that same approach with his partner. Allowing gay men to be Boy Scout leaders would not increase the rate of pedophilia so far achieved by the straight counselors plying /their/ disgusting lusts.

    • I did not imply there are more pedophiles in the gay ranks than in the straight ranks. First of all, there are male pedophiles that prefer little girls to boys. They are sick, but not gay. As to male pedophiles that prey on boys, they are not “straight,” but both sick and gay.

    • pastorjackwilson on said:

      Hi Andrew,
      I wanted to jump in here if I may. You said, “Homosexuality is not an uncontrollable urge any more than heterosexuality is…” The intrinsic word here is uncontrollable. You see, people have all kinds of urges. One might get the urge to climb up a bridge and scream. That is an illogical urge. Men have urges towards woman. That is a God given urge. We have urges to eat but we might not just grab an apple from a strangers bag because we have an urge. Homosexuality and the like are un natural urges who some very otherwise normal people get. They need to be controlled. With the apple, go buy one. With homosexuality, read a book.

  2. I don’t understand why the subject of one’s sexuality should even come up in an organization such as the BSA. If being homosexual is something that needs to be brought out in the open in a scouting program, why don’t homosexuals have something like the BSA, but for kids who identify with being homosexual. Perhaps they could call themselves “Rainbow Scouts.”

  3. I am not a big boy scout fan. It stems from the fact that when I was a young boy I joined but was thrown out within two weeks because Pop could not afford the uniform. I do think it is a good organization if you can afford it. However with the inclusion of homosexuals it will probably evolve into a place where men will scout boys. If people will pull their kids out, that will leave them to change the name to the homo scouts and perhaps young straight boys can start their own organization. I think the point is that the homosexual community wants and advantage to ply their disgusting lusts wherever there are straight people.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: